I understand that, especially, the title of my post: Figuring Out what to do with People Like Me may have seemed conceited and narcissistic.
Certainly, it was audacious. (But, then, it strikes me that audacity is often a characteristic of the prophetic.)
Still, I felt a much stronger impulse to enter that post than I do with almost everything that I put on the blog.
And, as I reflected on Dan Masshardt's comment and, my reply to it, I've had several thoughts worth of posts, some of which I consider to be important.
Here's one:
One aspect of what happens before a revival is that the visible, or organized, church becomes incapable of engaging and satisfying the spiritually passionate people Christ gives to it.
There can be two types of people l lost to the church: One is the unbeliever. The other? The believer who is out of sync with the church.
As you think about my post, understand that it's about what the church does with People Like me, not with me myself.
There is a chasm, a gulf, these days, between what's being done by the influencers and decision makers of American institutional Christianity and the yearnings and desires of many spiritually passionate Jesus-followers. They love Jesus, but not the church.
I see a significant, and increasing, number of people, these days, who love and who follow Jesus who are not, as Hebrews 10 says, stirred up (ESV) "to love and good works" by today's church, i.e., they are not being fed by the visible, institutional church. They starve, spiritually, when connected to the church.
For the most part, these are people who struggle, in every moment of daily life, to know what it means to seek God's Kingdom and His righteousness...and, actually, to do that.
And, they see today's church trying to save itself first, and not empowering its people to be men and women of the Kingdom, not, as Paul says existing "to prepare the saints for works of service."
Sadly, if and when those people attend a worship service they are not stirred up to love and good works. They feel as if they are being entertained not edified to live the life. And, they are frustrated. And, at least one of those people I know feels sick to the stomach in a so-called worship service.
As far as today's church is concerned, they are, at best, dissatisfied and restless, at worst, they've completely given up hope in the organized church
That second group of people, the completely given up hope people, will not be won back to the church unless the church changes,...
...which is the point of my original post.
Those who've given up on the organized church respond in a variety of ways. Sadly, some have even lost a clear focus on Christ, as Dan Masshardt notes, but most haven't.
Most truly do struggle to follow Jesus. They do, as Paul admonished the Philippians, "work out (their) own salvation with fear and trembling," and, sadly, they do that without reference to organized Christianity.
And, please understand. I'm not one of those people. This blog itself proves my love for the people of the institutional church, if not for the institutional church itself.
----------------
Now, as far as the title of the post is concerned, here's the thing:
A revival is always a radically new and different way.
When a revival takes place, what passes for establishment Christianity i.e., Churchianity, is left behind.
Historically, the organized church is ALWAYS, ALWAYS, scandalized by the new ways of revival, which it deems to be too radical, and, honestly, offensive and unchristian.
It always, ALWAYS, holds on to its traditions.
Blow the dust off of your church history books, if you doubt that...
...and, the spiritually passionate people, yearning for what Churchianity can't and won't provide, will drop the organized church like a hot potato to join in a work of the Spirit.
In the future, history always looks back favorably on the people who dumped the organized church for the new ways.
It always does.
----------------
So, why try to figure out what to do with people like me?
The Lord of all authority and power and blessing isn't blessing today's organized Christianity.
Organized Christianity is declining. Organized Christianity is decaying. It's people talk change but the change it actually puts into action is minor.
I've said many times here and as far back as the days of Brian Miller's Emerging CGGC blog that, when I was in school studying the history of revivalism, one way to understand the history of revivalism is to think of it as the History of Paradigm Change.
The people I know of who are attempting to lead the institutional church out of its decline and decay are people who are committed, first and foremost, to saving the current church paradigm.
In my body, this reality is made vividly clear by a recent and aborted series of teachings from its Director of Transformational Ministries on APEST.
He sees the local church pastor, or parish priest, as a, what?, facilitator? Director? of APEST in the local church.
This is totally old school, old paradigm. This is an attempt to redeem, for the future, the role of the pastor, to gently tweak the pastor dominated leadership culture. This is church, not Kingdom, focus.
This is a stab at being progressive in the old paradigm.
Historically, efforts of even the progressives among old paradigmers, fail.
Historically, all people loyal, first and foremost, to the old ways:
1. Are scandalized by the new ways ways of a revival,
2. Are left in its dust, and,
3. Are understood by history as visionless opposers of the work of the Spirit.
The lesson of history is that if you are not cordial toward people who are restless and yearning for new ways, you will be out of step with the Spirit when He moves and calls people to move with Him in a new way.
And, He has always moved.
And, revival has always been a radical departure from the established ways.
----------------
I, personally, have a history with today's institutional church.
Actually, it's probably more accurate to say that a small part of today's institutional church has a history with me.
I'm writing this post, but, please, forget me.
Don't, however, forget the people like me.
There are gobs of people who love Jesus who are either not connected to the visible church or are distantly connected to it.
As the Builder and Boomer generations fade away, the proportion of people in America with little, or no, connection to institutional Christianity increases, and it increases more and more rapidly.
I can't say prophetically that a new paradigm, a revival, is about to take hold.
What I can say is that, without repentance, most of the people in today's organized, visible, institutional church will miss out on it.
Bill -
ReplyDeleteYou write a lot of good stuff here. That said, I'm going to continue on the challenges. :-)
In the vast majority of instances I can think of (there probably are exceptions) revivals resulted in new bodies / gatherings / networks etc. And quickly.
The protestant reformation initually produced many denominations. Wesley's revivals led to the methodist movement. Winebrenner led to the church of God.
What I hear you talking about is passionate Jesus followers who are disconnected from a body.
This seems to me not the history of revival and I doubt it would be today.
Historically, those who felt dissatisfied with the status quo formed new movements, denominations, congregations etc.
If people are being seriously stifled by the local church - and I suspect that often they are - I completely understand not wanted to be affiliated.
But the alternative isn't to go it alone.
You can't apest alone. You can't practice the 'one anothers' of the New Testament alone.
Alone is never the answer to a dysfunctional church system.
There are several decent possibilities when faced with a messed up context. Choosing to go it alone is not a biblically faithful option.
If that seems the best permanent option, your sold out believers aren't as devoted to Christ as you think they are, in my understanding of the New Testament.
Dan,
DeleteThanks, again, for putting this on the blog. And, please excuse the slow reply. Lots going on in our family and with the ambassadorship...and, I am a geezer.
Of course, revivals result in the forming of new bodies. My point is that, when the revival takes place, in a year, or decade, or century, today's institutional church will be left behind by it.
Lance, and Brandon, and the other guys (and gals) in the CGGC mountaintopper band, continue to attempt to fashion a "Ninevite Revival," i.e., one that is influenced by human leadership. But, they're doing all the wrong things.
They should be putting on sack cloth, as did the king of Nineveh, and begging the rest of us to do so. After all, it is the poor in spirit who are blessed. "Godly grief produces a repentance that leads to salvation..."
The spiritually passionate people I'm speaking of are not opposed to being a part of a body. What they're against is today's organized and institutionalized church, which bears no resemblance to the New Testament body, which is not being blessed and which continues to decline and decay.
For the most part these people fashion fellowship for themselves. A while back, a poll of religious practices in the United States showed that more Americans participate in house churches than the number of Americans who call themselves atheists. And, there are countless ways people seek community apart from organized religion, which is useless to more and more people all the time.
I disagree with your suggestion that, in the past, dissatisfied people formed new movements. Rather, new movements formed as a result of the working of the Spirit around a fresh paradigm. And, I'm saying that conditions today are ripe for that to happen. When it will happen, I don't know.
I don't, apparently, know how to explain that the people I'm describing don't wish to "go it alone." It's that visible, organized and institutional religion impairs their yearning to seek God's Kingdom and righteousness.
I suspect that one of the issues for these people, and for organized Christianity is a sort of arrogance in the institution which refuses to take seriously the struggles of people who love Jesus but dislike the organized church. The church seems only to want to improve the institution and give the message: "Take it or leave it," to passionate Jesus lovers who can't abide what the institutional church has become...and, is becoming.